14_164_rtf

14|...|164

AUTHORITIES DOING NOTHING On 26.03.20 the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) and the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) were both contacted to advise them that, amongst things, that several of their members, also happen to be business associates/directors of Mesa of Lippl.   Nothing so strange here except that accountants/auditors HULL were engaged to conduct the audit @ Lippl clearly a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest as defined by the FRC--Glossary of terms page 18 of 36... ... Independence—  Freedom from conditions and relationships which, in the context of an engagement, would compromise the integrity or objectivity of the firm or covered persons. Integrity or objectivity (and therefore independence) would be compromised if it is probable (more likely than not) that an objective, reasonable and informed third party would conclude that the threats, arising from any conditions or relationships that exist (taking into account any conflicts of interest that they may cause, or generally be perceived to cause, or otherwise, and having regard to any safeguards implemented), would impair integrity or objectivity to such an extent that it would be inappropriate for the firm to accept or continue to perform the audit or other public interest assurance engagement unless the threats were eliminated or further reduced or unless more, or more effective, safeguards were implemented.  FRC washed their hands of the opportunity to keep the public safe from the seemingly ‘holes in accounts'. Nor is this the first it seems that this method has been used to ‘keep things between them’ and ‘away from prying eyes’.  The ICAEW gave a reference number—"Our ref:054906”--and said to wait to hear from them.      Nothing been heard from the ICAEW since.   Previously, after reporting the £500k hole in the accounts, and the misrepresentation being confirmed by a forensic accountant and reported on to them, the ICAEW, did nothing about that then either.  Seems likely that had the seriousness, the frequency of the ‘misrepresentation and the disregard for the lawful practices been addressed at that time, some of the latest ‘creativity’ would have been prevented. Similarly, Company X was forced to issue threats before they were able to persuade Mesa that their retaining monies that belonged to the company and not Mesa personally, could have been avoided if the authorities had acted when they were advised of the types of behaviour Mesa was engaging in. The ‘method’ Mesa uses to avoid the full and proper audit is simple.   Their accountant/auditor ‘business associates’ set up an organisation to practice accountancy and auditing.   Mesa ‘engages’ their 'tame auditors sema1’ and 'tame auditors anst 2' to conduct the audit.  The audit merely comprises of sending a junior to Lippl; the junior spends a week at Lippl and the sum of their 'audit work' is they obtain a handful of copy invoices before they return to base. The ‘audit’ is signed off by the ‘tame auditors’ as complete and with the benefit of the financial statements signed off without anyone checking the integrity of the them or any of the ‘transactions’ effected by Mesa, Jago, tame auditors or Boss_Jaro. No-one is any the wiser. No-one seems to want to address the obvious.    ***

COMPLAINT TO ICAEW REGARDING AUDIT BEING CONDUCTED BY BUSINESS ASSOCIATES TO FAVOUR EACH OTHER AND BURY HISTORY

Anst_tame_auditor Sema tame auditor

COMPANIES HOUSE DOCUMENTS SHOWING SHARED BUSINESS INTERESTS OF AUDITORS AND AUDITED LTD COMPANY, LIPPL

***

25/04/20

Well here we are a full month has elapsed for the ICAEW and FRC to ‘investigate’ the improper relationships between auditor and auditee, Mesa, and nothing has happened.

Sent a follow up communication with a request for an update and to know when they’ll be asking for documentation but doubtless nothing is progressing and those that help themselves are being protected.

By comparison Richard Branson has put out his begging bowl for tax-payers hard-earned cash to inject in to their business during Covid-19 scenario and them furloughing staff. 

Strange then to know that Branson’s Australian arm of the business has debts of $7bn.  They’re looking for a buyer (presumably State sponsored preferably).  So, this would mean that it is yet again the tax-payer whose money is siphoned off in to the pockets of a multi-billionaire.  They’ll let Branson keep his billions—that should have gone to paying the creditors—and the people toiling away to earn enough to keep their families will have to pay the price.  More than strange that the Authorities--do nothing, say nothing, allow it to happen.

VictoriaBeckham and Stella McCartney more Covid-19 robbers and the Authorities stay schtum.

Seemed only fair to mentioned to those same ‘gatekeepers of the financial swamp’ that in addition Boss_Jaro, Boss’s_Pet and HR, have, for many a year now been helping Boss’s_Pet own tax-evasion scheme.

It’s a fairly simple scheme that entails Boss’s_Pet sister being paid for the cleaning both of them do at Lippl on a Friday night.  They split the two units, each taking one unit to clean.  Then, Boss’s_Pet’s sister is paid monthly for the clean, and because it’s their own job get to take full advantage of a yearly tax allowance.  They then withdraw cash and hand it over to Boss’s_Pet for their share of the cleaning payment—eliminating any deduction for tax and NI for Boss’s_Pet and allowing them to tuck it away. 

So far this year, they said they’ve bought diamond rings, earrings and the designer watch they’ve had their eye on and said they were getting, is, no doubt. safely tucked away at home as too good to wear to work.

Nice to see Boss_Jaro helping their friends to help themselves--after all Boss’s_Pet has watched Mesa and co. do the same.  As Boss’s_Pet says “(Mesa’s) being fiddling for years.”

Branson's Origins of Billionairedom--Others sufferering from sticky fingers
Michael-O-Leary-lambasts-Government-Branson-rescue.html