Everyone welcome to the on-going court case to see and hear the evidence for themselves on 23rd October 2014 at Coventry County Court @ 10:00

Everyone welcome to the on-going court case to see and hear the evidence for themselves 1IR80398, on 23rd October 2014 at Coventry County Court @ 10:00

Removal of right of both parties to be heard....seems that Judicial bias in Leicestershire case 1IR80398 continues

One of three cases -police, Land registry & court - brought by people with connections to the police, judiciary, solicitors and councils and being vigorously defended despite the on-going intimidation, harassment and subjugation of my rights - Property developers looking to increase their profits by taking my garden.

My Defence (for allegations are untrue) and Counterclaim for (restorative damages and punitive damages are being suppressed) in order it seems to continue to provide greater personal rights and legal rights for the claimant's cabal.

It seems the sometimes solicitor and claimant are, as I right, colluding to hide assets (selling property without advertising) in order to deny me proper costs and damages in the three cases.

The judge is allowing the continuation of both the sometime solicitor (see how they come on and off record) and the claimant to act as legal representation and expects me to deal with both in this manner up to the case being heard on 23rd October 2014 at Coventry County Court at 10:00am.

The claimant's claim includes invoices (provided by the sometimes solicitor) which look strange (especially for a medium-sized legal practice) - absence of invoice numbers, difference in livery to that on website, difference in spelling of practice address.

The claimant says that the court ordered the retrieval of my confession and what they say and do is in the court's name, which as well as being untrue is further harassment and subjugation by them.


documents which are referenced are on a separate page for viewing

More Hindrances via The masonic connections

More Hindrances via The masonic connections

09/08/2010 Martin Doyle (6526) Upheld that whatever Williams was [raising yet another false complaint]

09/08/2010  Martin Doyle (6526)  Upheld that whatever Williams was saying happened [raising yet another false complaint] said was a legitimate police complaint but my resisting the cabal's harassment here was "a civil matter"

/ 

From: Yvonne H < >
Sent: 24 May 2010 00:40
To: Claire Frisby <cparish@frisbysmall.co.uk>
Subject: PLEASE FORWARD: A MCNeill re Williams 32 Lea Close
Importance: High

Please advise your now client to desist from shouting at and harassing me and my daughter.

Williams shouted at my daughter on Saturday when visiting my property in their usual aggressive and provocative manner; they have no business doing this and I shall be informing my solicitor to write instructing you to advise your client of same.

Further, shouting at me from outside my home is a further act of aggression and provocation and

shouting - "talk to me then; oh no you can't can you because I've had you arrested and
you're out on bail" will not be tolerated.

It is mighty interesting that just last week-end the same Williams was shouting at my daughter
that "if she wanted to help [your] mum I'm willing to talk" and prior to that "have you got a
solicitor yet as I'm going to make sure it costs you a packet". 

We have adhered to Williams original missive in January 2010 stating that we should only contact him via his legal representation and the matter was immediately put in the hands of our
solicitor.  Your client affords himself honours that he does not have the decency to reciprocate
and his despicable behaviours have been immediately notified onwards.

To reiterate advise he refrains from any further such behaviour immediately.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

1. I was upstairs closing a window when spotted by Williams & Smail by their car
2. Williams started shouting per the above and laughing as they think abusing a SWF mother is funny
3. Williams called the police and claimed it was an alternative scenario that took place and that 
4. Williams had set up CCTV directly pointing at and looking in to my property
5. The police arrested me on the fake claims of Williams and (they would both go on to make false statements, aided and abetted by police colleagues of Williams family PS Mark Williams from Market Harborough)
6. The false allegations were denied and I called for the CCTV to be given to the solicitor but the false 'word' of a mason trumped everything
7. I was arrested at 6pm and kept in a locked cell for longer than suspected paedophile 
8. The police followed me to a third-party address rather than my house to arrest me
9. the police waited until PC Yearby returned from a long holiday before arresting me
10. The policemen issuing the arrest were PS Mark Williams - that they were family was kept hidden
11. No attempt by the police to investigate
12. The police and JoP Smail visited the Williams and concocted a statement in order to concoct grounds to provide leverage to obtain my property
13. Solicitor Cox did not request the evidence of my not doing as they faked
14. POI - Williams & McNeill & the police/masonic cabal later go on to say that they knew nothing of my having a solicitor (when they clearly did)

22/05/2010 22:56

22/05/2010   22:56

			Williams having shouted aggressively at me faked a complaint towards me in order to cover his backside       As I did not speak the CCTV would prove Williams & Smail's further fabrications but the police & judiciary family cabal were not going to have that happen       Solicitor Cox did not call for any evidence       So the further fabricated complaints to prevent me going about my lawful business continues.       Exposing Williams/police lies by failure of them to produce CCTV       Ulterior motive of Williams/Smail to take property from me       Ulterior motive of Williams/Smail to cost me money so I am unable to afford defending myself against their perfidious claims

Created 201